- cl-debian@lists.common-lisp.net - mailman3.common-lisp.net

[cl-debian] stumpwm 1:20070908-1 MIGRATED to testing
by Debian testing watch 07 Dec '07

07 Dec '07

FYI: The status of the stumpwm source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1:20060930-3 Current version: 1:20070908-1 -- This email is automatically generated; henning(a)makholm.net is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.

1 0

[cl-debian] s-xml 1:20060513-7 MIGRATED to testing
by Debian testing watch 07 Dec '07

07 Dec '07

FYI: The status of the s-xml source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1:20060513-3 Current version: 1:20060513-7 -- This email is automatically generated; henning(a)makholm.net is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.

1 0

[cl-debian] qbook 1:20071118-1 MIGRATED to testing
by Debian testing watch 07 Dec '07

07 Dec '07

FYI: The status of the qbook source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1:20061003-1 Current version: 1:20071118-1 -- This email is automatically generated; henning(a)makholm.net is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.

1 0

[cl-debian] fiveam 1:20071118-1 MIGRATED to testing
by Debian testing watch 07 Dec '07

07 Dec '07

FYI: The status of the fiveam source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1:20061003-1 Current version: 1:20071118-1 -- This email is automatically generated; henning(a)makholm.net is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.

1 0

[cl-debian] arnesi 1:20071118-1 MIGRATED to testing
by Debian testing watch 07 Dec '07

07 Dec '07

FYI: The status of the arnesi source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1:20061003-1 Current version: 1:20071118-1 -- This email is automatically generated; henning(a)makholm.net is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.

1 0

Re: [cl-debian] VCS poll
by Luca Capello 02 Dec '07

02 Dec '07

Hi Pierre! On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 23:19:48 +0100, Pierre THIERRY wrote: > Scribit Luca Capello dies 02/12/2007 hora 22:33: >> For the sake of information, I think we need a VCS that can handle >> merging from other VCSs. > > Do we need a single one? The idea behing having a single VCS is that people that want to contribute to the CL-Debian group needs to learn one unique VCS (instead of 3 now, darcs, bzr and mercurial). I clearly understand the opposite side, but I think that uniformity against the group is far more important. Obviously, these are my own feelings ;-) Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca

2 1

[cl-debian] VCS poll
by Peter Van Eynde 02 Dec '07

02 Dec '07

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi people, Luca and me wanted to have some rough idea of what people want to and prefer to use, so I created a quick poll at http://pvaneynd.livejournal.com/93257.html it should not take you more then 1 minute to fill it in, so please do so. Groetjes, Peter - -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHTlC211ldN0tyliURApI2AKC99tSWyCqrXu020WLD+gR+bqFfKQCeMCcK ieQ2tE+PDMPTNQZ4oXdq/Hc= =+j3s -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 3

[cl-debian] Accepted gcl 2.6.7-36 (source i386 all)
by Camm Maguire 30 Nov '07

30 Nov '07

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:03:31 -0500 Source: gcl Binary: gcl-doc gcl Architecture: source i386 all Version: 2.6.7-36 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Camm Maguire <camm(a)enhanced.com> Changed-By: Camm Maguire <camm(a)enhanced.com> Description: gcl - GNU Common Lisp compiler gcl-doc - Documentation for GNU Common Lisp Changes: gcl (2.6.7-36) unstable; urgency=low . * statsysbfd in Debian, incoporating modules into libgcl.a for compiler::link support Files: 296b86ccb2ff91935bb685b1b817937f 720 interpreters optional gcl_2.6.7-36.dsc a2c2596cd69c0e6be298e46fc1b97c7a 14499091 interpreters optional gcl_2.6.7-36.diff.gz 10b8eaf890067c1c27111adba250f798 576374 doc optional gcl-doc_2.6.7-36_all.deb 8257814b69b4bf7e94a976b4621c122a 33346316 interpreters optional gcl_2.6.7-36_i386.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHUEWnczG1wFfwRdwRAoW0AKCqWiLkSRogiGQKM/FZPkET5EBJHQCaAiUj ykOO7frIDyuzwDHj+EAmJ7Q= =WoHx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Accepted: gcl-doc_2.6.7-36_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcl/gcl-doc_2.6.7-36_all.deb gcl_2.6.7-36.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcl/gcl_2.6.7-36.diff.gz gcl_2.6.7-36.dsc to pool/main/g/gcl/gcl_2.6.7-36.dsc gcl_2.6.7-36_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcl/gcl_2.6.7-36_i386.deb

1 0

[cl-debian] cl-rfc2109: requesting comments
by Luca Capello 27 Nov '07

27 Nov '07

Hello all! Please Cc: me, I'm not subscribed to the list. Moreover, please keep at least the bug entry cc:ed, so people don't need to search in other locations. I need some legal advices about one of my packages, rfc2109 [1][2]. The main problem is that rfc2109.lisp contains verbatim parts of RFC2109, RFC2068 and the Netscape cookie spec, documents that are not free per the DFSG. When I removed them [2], I forgot the parts in the function descriptions, thus the package was rejected. Soon after the rejection, upstream committed a sed script [3] to easily remove the same RFC parts I removed (thus not the ones in the function descriptions). I find upstream solution (which replaces the RFC parts with empty lines) better than mine because it doesn't change line numbers and avoids conflicts when pulling from upstream. The latter, however, means that every time I pull from upstream, I need to re-apply the sed script (just a minor annoyance). However as already written, upstream solution, as mine, suffers the RFC parts in the function descriptions. Back in October 2006, Pierre Thierry asked if these parts could be allowed even if not-free [4], but no one answered him. Since I'm not a license nor an RFC expert, here I am :-) Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca Footnotes: [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=359348 [2] http://cl-debian.alioth.debian.org/repository/lcapello/ [2] Thu Jul 20 23:04:07 CEST 2006 Luca Capello <luca(a)pca.it> * remove the non-DFSG documents from rfc2109.lisp 20060720210407-f6b0c-b84ff59374546e09173fadd6ec1b249db30b6fd2.gz [3] Wed Aug 9 21:58:18 CEST 2006 Alan Shields <patches(a)alan.shields.name> * easily strip RFC from rfc2109 for copyright concerns 20060809195818-df180-565dcf76a4cfffa29341ff033cbe3bb4362ab878.gz [4] http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/2006-October/001957.html

3 2

[cl-debian] Re: Bug#451975: ITP: cl-plplot -- A CFFI based interface to the PLplot scientific plotting library
by Luca Capello 26 Nov '07

26 Nov '07

Hi Philipp! On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:26:26 +0100, Philipp Benner wrote: > * Package name : cl-plplot > Version : 0.4.0 > Upstream Author : Hazen Babcoc <hbabcockos1(a)mac.com> > * URL : http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-plplot/ Are you going to maintain the package under the CL-Debian umbrella [1]? Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca Footnotes: [1] http://cl-debian.alioth.debian.org

2 1