Re: [cl-json-devel] Any interest in moving from darcs to git?

On 11/12/12 Nov 12 -5:32 PM, Henrik Hjelte wrote:

On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Robert Goldman <rpgoldman@sift.info mailto:rpgoldman@sift.info> wrote:

On 11/8/12 Nov 8 -1:31 AM, Henrik Hjelte wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Robert Goldman
<rpgoldman@sift.info <mailto:rpgoldman@sift.info>
> <mailto:rpgoldman@sift.info <mailto:rpgoldman@sift.info>>> wrote:
>
>     Note that I don't think that darcs, in and of itself, is a bad
system.
>     But there are more than enough DCVSes out there, and we can
use one less
>     of them.
>
>
> I think it is a good idea, it crossed my mind too. Also github is
a good
> environment for cooperating.
> I think the darcs repo should live for some time while we
double-commit.
> If no one objects, I'll try to do it quite soon.

Sounds good.  I have a preference for a canonical git repo at
c-l.net <http://c-l.net>,
although a pointer from the c-l.net <http://c-l.net> web page to one
on github would be
ok.  

I read this mail after I did the git migration, but I did it like that. The docs are still on common-lisp but mentions the github url.

What I'd like us to avoid is that mess where there are a dozen
github repos for the same library, and no one knows which one is
canonical.  

I did a git-repo here: https://github.com/hankhero/cl-json I am not sure it would add something to host it on common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net instead. Other such as hunchentoot seem to be on github.

That looks great, thanks!

Really appreciate your doing this.

Best, Robert