On 1/13/10 Jan 13 -4:29 PM, Henrik Hjelte wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Robert Goldman rpgoldman@sift.info wrote:
In the current version of CL-JSON, defining a json-rpc-function puts the /function/ in a hash-table.
I have been wrestling with testing my json-rpc-2.0 code
Great, I saw you were active on the json-rpc mailing list as well.
and find that
this structure makes my code hard to debug. In particular, I can't effectively TRACE a function that's exported from cl-json.
While you are testing, you might consider coding some testcases at the same time.
Yes, I have been --- I have been extending the existing JSON-RPC tests with others that exercise the new :boolean and :array coding schemes, and also that check both 1.1 and 2.0 behaviors.
I am holding off submitting my patches until such a time as I have those tests in place and passing.
best, r