Rudi Schlatte wrote:

Hmm, muproc-compat.lisp (in your proposal below) would be essentially

documentation, and would only be loaded on otherwise unsupported Lisp implementations. In that light, would it make sense to create muproc-compat.txt (or porting.txt) and document the muproc-compat interface there? Alternatively, the documentation could also be written as comments in the :exports section of the defpackage form for the cl-muproc.compat package.

There's a new version of cl-muproc incorporating Rudi's new with a few modifcations... I decided that with implementation specific files, muproc-compat.lisp did not make much sense. I think the package definition for cl-muproc.compat defines the required implementation specific functionality adequately, and decided to add a PORTING file briefly describing the intended structure of implementation specific code instead.

The new version compiles without warnings and passes the test on Lispworks.

Enjoy.

-Klaus.