Re: [cl-opengl-devel] cl-opengl and clx naming conflict

On 20/01/2008, David Lichteblau <david@lichteblau.com> wrote:

Unfortunately cl-opengl and CLX both define a package called GL, so we cannot dump a core file including them.

Is there a chance that cl-opengl might switch to a more specific package name?

That sucks. We need namespaces for packages. I'd argue that CLX could more easily use GLX as the package name. Any luck on that side? -- Luís Oliveira http://student.dei.uc.pt/~lmoliv/