21 Jan
2008
21 Jan
'08
6:15 p.m.
Quoting Lu?s Oliveira (luismbo@gmail.com):
That sucks. We need namespaces for packages. I'd argue that CLX could more easily use GLX as the package name. Any luck on that side?
If I understood Christophe Rhodes right, he would be prepared to accept a patch renaming CLX's GL package. (Not sure about GLX, since there are already two distinct packages in CLX called GL and GLX.)
d.