[cl-opengl-devel] Darcs tree permitions and first changes
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/326b108ffcc42f27628703b0c11ed239.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hello, First message, yay. Oliver, can you set the permissions up so that I can push my first patch? Tue Jan 31 19:09:56 WET 2006 Luis Oliveira <loliveira@common-lisp.net> * Minor changes - added HEADER file. - changed library.lisp to use BSD license. - removed tabs from state.lisp Also, I'll be adding some stubs for cl-glu and cl-glut. And then I'll start by converting my examples to your bindings and implementing whatever is necessary for those from GLU and GLUT. BTW, can I add this mailing list to Gmane? -- Luís Oliveira http://student.dei.uc.pt/~lmoliv/ Equipa Portuguesa do Translation Project http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/translation/registry.cgi?team=pt
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/22f91ca3ae0e83b20c824fb357e33702.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 31.01.2006, at 20:15, Luís Oliveira wrote:
First message, yay. Oliver, can you set the permissions up so that I can push my first patch?
They should be fixed now. I forgot about this "groups" thingie ;)
Also, I'll be adding some stubs for cl-glu and cl-glut. And then I'll start by converting my examples to your bindings and implementing whatever is necessary for those from GLU and GLUT.
Sounds good. There doesn't seem to be a big difference between the bindings anyway. Feel free to add whatever you need. I'm a little busy until Friday, so I won't be able to do a lot of work till then unfortunately.
BTW, can I add this mailing list to Gmane?
Sure, go ahead. -- Oliver Markovic
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/326b108ffcc42f27628703b0c11ed239.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 2006-jan-31, at 21:42, Oliver Markovic wrote:
I'm a little busy until Friday, so I won't be able to do a lot of work till then unfortunately.
Ok I fixed a few trivial bugs that were preventing cl-opengl from compiling and I should have a working example soon. I really like the way you're making the bindings lispy, btw. First question (possibly a silly question, I know very little about OpenGL): Why plural WITH-PRIMITIVES when it takes only on argument? Wouldn't WITH-PRIMITIVE make more sense? Sorry if this is a silly question. :-) If WITH-PRIMITIVE makes more sense, I'll push a patch renaming it, fixing the bugs, etc... -- Luís Oliveira http://student.dei.uc.pt/~lmoliv/ Equipa Portuguesa do Translation Project http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/translation/registry.cgi?team=pt
participants (2)
-
Luís Oliveira
-
Oliver Markovic