[cl-opengl-devel] cl-opengl and clx naming conflict
Hi, I was hoping to add cl-opengl as a main project to clbuild. Unfortunately cl-opengl and CLX both define a package called GL, so we cannot dump a core file including them. Is there a chance that cl-opengl might switch to a more specific package name? d.
On 20/01/2008, David Lichteblau <david@lichteblau.com> wrote:
Unfortunately cl-opengl and CLX both define a package called GL, so we cannot dump a core file including them.
Is there a chance that cl-opengl might switch to a more specific package name?
That sucks. We need namespaces for packages. I'd argue that CLX could more easily use GLX as the package name. Any luck on that side? -- Luís Oliveira http://student.dei.uc.pt/~lmoliv/
Quoting Lu?s Oliveira (luismbo@gmail.com):
That sucks. We need namespaces for packages. I'd argue that CLX could more easily use GLX as the package name. Any luck on that side?
If I understood Christophe Rhodes right, he would be prepared to accept a patch renaming CLX's GL package. (Not sure about GLX, since there are already two distinct packages in CLX called GL and GLX.) d.
participants (2)
-
David Lichteblau -
Luís Oliveira