[cl-opengl-devel] Approach taken by cl-opengl for binding creation
Hi guys. I really like the cl-opengl bindings, well done! Would somebody care to give a few lines describing how they were made & the underlying philosophy? From reading the code it looks totally hand tailored, apart from the automatic enum generation. Is this an accurate statement? Are the bindings so nice simply because a lot of care was taken? I plan to create bindings for nVidia's Cg API, which I'll post here at some stage in the future. Cheers Brad
On 26/06/07, Brad Beveridge <brad.beveridge@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi guys. I really like the cl-opengl bindings, well done! Would somebody care to give a few lines describing how they were made & the underlying philosophy? From reading the code it looks totally hand tailored, apart from the automatic enum generation.
The cl-opengl-thomas branch also generates the (low-level) bindings from the spec.
Is this an accurate statement? Are the bindings so nice simply because a lot of care was taken?
Yes, I believe a lot of care was taken. The lispy feel is there because the automatically generated bindings aren't exported directly. -- Luís Oliveira http://student.dei.uc.pt/~lmoliv/
participants (2)
-
Brad Beveridge -
Luís Oliveira