On Jun 25, 9:21 pm, Edi Weitz <e...(a)agharta.de> wrote:
> The question is - what do you want to achieve with this regular
> expression? Can't you write it in a simpler way?
Isn't this pattern pretty useful in general:
A@B
where A and B are word characters and @ is a specific non-word
character?
How else could we specify it?
[a-zA-Z0-9] doesn't seem acceptable to me since it relies on
the latin alphabet...
Leslie
--
http://www.linkedin.com/in/polzer
