26 Jun
2009
26 Jun
'09
4:09 p.m.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 15:10, Leslie P. Polzersky@viridian-project.de wrote:
On Jun 25, 9:21 pm, Edi Weitz e...@agharta.de wrote:
The question is - what do you want to achieve with this regular expression? Can't you write it in a simpler way?
Isn't this pattern pretty useful in general:
A@B
where A and B are word characters and @ is a specific non-word character?
Sure, but the original bug report was about this:
(\w+)*\@\w+
I can't make any sense of this regular expression, but maybe it is because I am lacking some skills. Maybe Wu can explain what he wants to achive with it?
-Hans