On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:24:06 +0000, Christophe Rhodes csr21@cam.ac.uk wrote:
Also, does setting cl-ppcre:*regex-char-code-limit* to 128 before making your parser function make any difference?
That does the trick, thanks. I should have thought about this myself, sorry.
Could you explain, for a Unicode ignorant like me, why CHAR-CODE-LIMIT is so high in SBCL and CLISP? Does Unicode really define 1114112 characters?
Thanks, Edi.
cl-ppcre-devel@common-lisp.net