Hi Edi,
The documentation is wrong since the patch included in 1.3.1.
- It should mention that regex-replace-all returns a second value "matchp" as regex-replace does. - The examples needs to be updated to reflect the introduction of this second value. - The changelog should also mentioned that regex-replace-all was updated.
Cheers, Sebastien
PS: one day, I will learn how to submit nice diff patch... on my windows machine :-)
The documentation is wrong since the patch included in 1.3.1.
- It should mention that regex-replace-all returns a second value "matchp" as regex-replace does.
- The examples needs to be updated to reflect the introduction of this second value.
- The changelog should also mentioned that regex-replace-all was updated.
Thanks, I totally missed that. Should be fixed now.
Edi.
cl-ppcre-devel@common-lisp.net