April 2007 - cl-who-announce@lists.common-lisp.net

[cl-who-announce] New release 0.8.1 (Was: [cl-who-devel] New release 0.8.0)
by Edi Weitz 27 Apr '07

27 Apr '07

On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:56:33 -0700, "Mac Chan" <emailmac(a)gmail.com> wrote: > BTW, I immediately found a bug! ........ in the doc ;-) Argh - I had complete forgotten about all this old cruft. I've cleaned it up now. Thanks, Edi.

1 0

[cl-who-announce] New release 0.8.0 (Was: html empty tags)
by Edi Weitz 27 Apr '07

27 Apr '07

On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:19:36 -0700, "Mac Chan" <emailmac(a)gmail.com> wrote: > As you probably know, there are certain html tags that will break > the browser's rendering if they are not paired up properly with a > close tag </tag> even if it's content is empty. > > For example, <textarea> and <script> (ie) > > Well today I'm bitten by this, where <div id='header' /> messes up > firefox's rendering coupled with some css rules. > > Even though I'm awared of how to get around it, sometimes it's > rather hard to spot that with a sea of nested (:div (:div ...)). > > This is also a recurring problem for newbie and there were a few > threads regarding this. > > Attach is a patch to fix this. Thanks, that's quite useful. I've incorporated it into the new release. However, I think the actual test you had in who.lisp is not quite what you meant. Please check if my modification is OK. You also forgot to export the new symbols... :) > I'm not sure if anyone is using cl-who to generate XML. I'm pretty sure some people do. I also did it a couple of times. Thanks, Edi.

1 0

[cl-who-announce] New release 0.7.1 (Was: should cl-who::*html-mode* be a compile time flag?)
by Edi Weitz 05 Apr '07

05 Apr '07

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:36:30 -0700, "Mac Chan" <emailmac(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Sure, attached is a patch for this and also remove extra newlines if > no prologue is specified. Thanks. I've released a new version which incorporates your patches.

1 0