My only complaint about this, which is a minor one, is that when I see NIL in my HTML, it's a good sign that I've screwed something up. Now I won't have that anymore, but that's ok I guess. Cyrus On May 8, 2007, at 2:34 PM, Edi Weitz wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2007 19:26:30 -0700, "Mac Chan" <emailmac@gmail.com> wrote:
Attached is a diff for this change in case you guys agree that this makes sense.
Yes, I think it makes sense. I've made a new release with your patch incorporated.
Others, please note that this isn't fully backwards-compatible although I doubt that serious applications so far relied on the fact that (STR nil) would produce "NIL" in the output.
Thanks, Edi. _______________________________________________ cl-who-devel site list cl-who-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/cl-who-devel