5 Sep
2010
5 Sep
'10
1:01 p.m.
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:30 PM, rrl <endian.sign@gmail.com> wrote:
Thinking about it again, I think this patch is a bad idea. It's possible to have the desired effect without touching the code base
That's good to hear... :) Sorry for not replying earlier, I was busy with other things. ISTR that you'll also find similar ideas if you search the archive of this mailing list. I have to admit that I haven't cared much about CL-WHO recently, even less then of my other open source libs. Some stuff has happened in the BKNR repository, but that too was more than a year ago. Edi.