Hi
I have no objections about the new setup (although, the switch may confuse someone).
But, call me an old curmudgeon, I will want to be able to deploy my static web pages and NOT use some non-lisp page generation tool (if I understood correctly what it would entail) (*). Hence I would respectfully ask to be able to produce the-old-curmudgeon.common-lisp.X with possibly old age and quaint, "handcrafted" HTML.
All the best
MA
(*) Plus, a deployment via an invocation of http://helambda.sf.net should be a must (yes; I will eventually migrate it to common-lisp.net).
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 9:56 PM Eric Timmons etimmons@mit.edu wrote:
Very on board with this. Gitlab pages continues to get improvements. So the more we can switch to a vanilla pages setup, the more features we get for free and the less documentation we have to write and maintain.
Since Gitlab pages works for users as well, I'm personally excited to have etimmons.common-lisp.dev set up at some point :).
-Eric