Anton,
I copied the spamassassin configuration to the new box moments ago. Please let us know if your problem persists.
-Hans
2011/5/18 Anton Vodonosov avodonosov@yandex.ru:
Hello,
I am getting bounced by common-lisp.net mail server.
Hans, I remember there was a similar problem earlier, and you have added me to the spamassasin white list. Probably the white list is lost during the migration. Could you fix it?
Best regards,
- Anton
-------- Forwarded message -------- 18.05.2011, 01:37, mailer-daemon@yandex.ru:
**********
Это письмо отправлено почтовым сервером yandex.ru
К сожалению, мы вынуждены сообщить Вам о том, что Ваше письмо не может быть отправлено одному или нескольким адресатам. Причины указаны ниже.
Пожалуйста, не отвечайте на это сообщение.
**********
This is the mail system at host yandex.ru
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
Please, do not reply to this message.
cl-plus-ssl-devel@common-lisp.net;: host a.mx.common-lisp.net[74.115.254.14] said: 550 This message scored 2.3 spam points. (in reply to end of DATA command)
Reporting-MTA: dns; forward9.mail.yandex.net X-Yandex-Queue-ID: 5CC7BCE180B X-Yandex-Sender: rfc822; avodonosov@yandex.ru Arrival-Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 01:26:24 +0400 (MSD)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; cl-plus-ssl-devel@common-lisp.net Original-Recipient: rfc822;cl-plus-ssl-devel@common-lisp.net Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Remote-MTA: dns; a.mx.common-lisp.net Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 This message scored 2.3 spam points. -------- End of the forwarded message -------- Final-Recipient: rfc822; cl-plus-ssl-devel@common-lisp.net Original-Recipient: rfc822;cl-plus-ssl-devel@common-lisp.net Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Remote-MTA: dns; a.mx.common-lisp.net Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 This message scored 2.3 spam points.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Anton Vodonosov avodonosov@yandex.ru To: Attila Lendvai attila.lendvai@gmail.com Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 01:26:23 +0400 Subject: Re: [cl-plus-ssl-devel] concurrency problems when used with chrome? Hello Attila,
There is an outstanding multi-threading problem which so far was confirmed for CCL + Windows. We thought for Linux it works OK (it was tested with ApacheBench). You may find more details in the recent cl-plus-ssl-devel archives. In short, this problem is not easy to catch, and there is a hight probability if will remain unfixed in the nearest months.
What is your platform (OS and Lisp impl)? Any other details you think relevant?
As a workaround, until the problem is fixed, you may need to use a reverse proxy like nginx for https.
Best regards,
- Anton
18.05.2011, 00:49, "Attila Lendvai" attila.lendvai@gmail.com:
dear list,
i've successfully added https support to hu.dwim.web-server, which thanks to cl+ssl was much less trouble (for now) than i've expected.
it seems to work mostly fine with ff and opera, but with chrome i get the following error randomly in half of the worker threads (one worker for one connection):
The TLS/SSL connection on handle #.(SB-SYS:INT-SAP #X00C1C4A0) has been closed. (return code: 5)SSL error queue:
[Condition of type CL+SSL::SSL-ERROR-ZERO-RETURN]
the relevant part of the backtrace:
5: ((LABELS HU.DWIM.UTIL::HANDLE-LEVEL-1-ERROR) #<CL+SSL::SSL-ERROR-ZERO-RETURN {10088187B1}>) 6: (SIGNAL #<CL+SSL::SSL-ERROR-ZERO-RETURN {10088187B1}>) 7: (ERROR CL+SSL::SSL-ERROR-ZERO-RETURN :HANDLE #.(SB-SYS:INT-SAP #X7FFFEC0654B0) :RET 5 :QUEUE "SSL error queue: \n") 8: (CL+SSL::SSL-SIGNAL-ERROR #.(SB-SYS:INT-SAP #X7FFFEC0654B0) #<FUNCTION CL+SSL::SSL-READ> 5 0) 9: ((FLET #:WPO[READ-HTTP-REQUEST/HEAD]46)) 10: (HU.DWIM.WEB-SERVER::READ-HTTP-REQUEST/HEAD 15 #<CL+SSL::SSL-SERVER-STREAM for 15> #.(SB-SYS:INT-SAP #X7FFFEC0654B0) :LENGTH-LIMIT 65536)
i suspect that there's something inside cl+ssl that is not threadsafe, because afaik chrome is more aggressively parallel than the others... maybe there's a C struct that should be thread local and is a mere global?
unfortunately my first glance didn't find anything suspicious.
any ideas how to proceed with this?
-- attila
Notice your eroding (digital) freedom, and do something about it!
PGP: 2FA1 A9DC 9C1E BA25 A59C 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39 OTR XMPP: 8647EEAC EA30FEEF E1B55146 573E52EE 21B1FF06 BitCoin: 154uf86Vd9rpjMULd9CXa7nVwikknYZJiB
cl-plus-ssl-devel mailing list cl-plus-ssl-devel@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-plus-ssl-devel