Hi Cheryl, Mark,On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Mark Evenson <evenson@panix.com> wrote:Indeed for me it is a higher priority to remove the Ruby dependency and be able to generate the site from Lisp than it is to have a new site.--> On Apr 1, 2018, at 01:08, Cheryl Yang <lisp@cheryllium.com> wrote:>> Hello everyone, long time no talk!>> I hope everyone has been well. I've had... a hectic time of it but I'm settling down finally.>> I should apologize for how MIA and hard-to-reach I have been.> Hopefully now that things are more stable in my personal life, I can give more time to CL and other projects.>> As a start, I've written a basic design update for Common-Lisp.net. You can view and comment on the code for it here: https://gitlab.common-lisp.net/clo/site/merge_requests/1>> This features actual mobile responsiveness (yes, the last design had an embarrassing mistake, I know!) and removes the mtime dependency that was preventing us from upgrading Ruby on CLnet's servers. I think we're still on a very old Ruby version, hopefully this will allow us to upgrade it, or at least remove one more barrier.>> Please take your time to review it at your leisure; I know I'm sort of surprising everyone with this.> I've attached a few screenshots so you can see what it looks like at a glance.>> Thank you,> - C. YangI thought the plan was to port the current site over to a non-Ruby version in https://gitlab.common-lisp.net/clo/cl-site and then change that one?It would be considerably easier for the operators to get rid of the Ruby dependency.