Off topic: is the source code only available as lisppaste2.3.tar.gz or is there a source control repository available online with a later version?
 
I'm asking not for the sake of future support - I used it only once or twice and there are other pastebins in case lisppaste is disabled.
Just wanted to look through the code - maybe it has useful bits for other purposes.
 
Best regards,
- Anton
 
 
 
09.09.2017, 20:02, "Erik Huelsmann" <ehuels@gmail.com>:
Hi,
 
In the early days of web popularity, a very nice irc-bot+paste engine was developed, allowing discussion on IRC to be very nicely combined with paste sharing to help the discussion. It was written in lisp and given the nice name of "lisppaste".
 
While the idea was great to start out, in its grand days, the bot even joined over 60 channels(!), it has gradually seen increases in abuse; initially "just" to spam IRC channels (which caused the bot to be removed from all channels, loosing most of its usefulness), later with lots of inappropriate content being posted.
 
Various measures were taken over time to reduce the attractiveness of posting to lisppaste:
 * disabling of the XML-RPC api (which integrated with emacs!)
 * removal from the IRC channels
 * addition of a captcha
up to most recently even:
 * removal of the listing of posts
 
While the last measure was hoped to take care of the last incentive to post to lisppaste, it seems that links to the inappropriate content are posted elsewhere -- eliminating the need to list the pastes.
 
 
With the majority of pastes being irrelevant to lisppaste's purpose (supporting programmers discussing their code in IRC or other channels), because they're inappropriate content of some kind or another, my question to you all is:
 
What should we do with lisppaste? Should we simply remove it from the web? Should we put it in read-only mode* (so as to maintain the archive of relevant pastes)? Or are there other options? E.g. someone who wants to adopt lisppaste and invest the time and energy to implement measures to fight the spam and implement measures to discourage or disable posting of inappropriate content?
 
 
 
 
* If we put it in read-only mode, it's my opinion that the existing inappropriate content should still be cleaned. Any contributions to that effect would still be greatly appreciated.
 

--
Bye,
 
Erik.
 
http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP.
Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.