"Alvaro Miles" qnhfla17ln@yahoo.com writes:
[snip spam]
Ok, that's not fun. Our options:
a) install spamassassin in which case it doesn't work very well and we'll still get spam every now and then,
b) just let it keep pouring in, or
b) close the list to non-subscribed traffic.
What do you think?
Erik.
Erik Enge eenge@prium.net writes:
"Alvaro Miles" qnhfla17ln@yahoo.com writes:
[snip spam]
Ok, that's not fun. Our options:
a) install spamassassin in which case it doesn't work very well and we'll still get spam every now and then,
b) just let it keep pouring in, or
c) close the list to non-subscribed traffic.
What do you think?
b) is bad, I think. c) is the best option for most lists anyway, and without a) we will get more and more spam anyway... :-|
Erik Enge writes:
"Alvaro Miles" qnhfla17ln@yahoo.com writes:
[snip spam]
Ok, that's not fun. Our options:
a) install spamassassin in which case it doesn't work very well and we'll still get spam every now and then,
b) just let it keep pouring in, or
b) close the list to non-subscribed traffic.
What do you think?
Got this same one on clhp-devel
Last time I used spamassassin, it sucked. I'd opt for a bayesian filter like bogofilter. b) is not an option.
I'd say close it to non subscribers.
On 8559 day of my life Anthony Ventimiglia wrote:
Last time I used spamassassin, it sucked. I'd opt for a bayesian filter like bogofilter. b) is not an option.
Spamassassin now supports bayesian filtering too.
I'd say close it to non subscribers.
Ah!.. I read list with Gmane newsgate...
-
Anthony Ventimiglia -
Erik Enge -
Ivan Boldyrev -
Mario S. Mommer