2 Sep
2009
2 Sep
'09
1:48 a.m.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Drew Crampsie<drew.crampsie@gmail.com> wrote:
I understand that what a lot of people want is a 'standard library', and not an updated description. I'd like that too. But we have to get there somehow, and as it stands we cannot build our 'standard library' on Standard Common Lisp. That is what CLtL3 is trying to fix.
Point 2 is perhaps a bit confusing on this matter. Is building such a library part of the CLtL3 effort? If not, point 2 doesn't make that very clear. -- Luís Oliveira http://student.dei.uc.pt/~lmoliv/