Re: [cltl3-devel] RFC: CLtL3 Charter

On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Gustavogugamilare@gmail.com wrote:

I know, but I didn't like the approach of that CDR. I think that the standard functions gethash, make-hash-table, etc, should work for generic hashtables, no new packages should be needed. It also should specify how the type (or class) GENERIC-HASH-TABLE should be related to the system class HASH-TABLE (Is it a subtype? A proper subtype? Or a disjoint type?)

Indeed, the approach followed by Christophe Rhodes in his extensible sequences paper is much more appropriate.