On 6/8/11 5:21 AM, Faré wrote:
Can you upgrade your implementation to ship with the latest ASDF? Thanks! If you're still using 2.015 (or something even older), there have been many bug fixes, robustness, portability and upgradability enhancements and a few features implemented since.
Done, in cvs.
Also, the CLISP maintainers insist on having (require :asdf) not work and (require "asdf") work, whereas CMUCL does the opposite. Since the CLISP maintainers won't seem to budge, could you have CMUCL accept both?
I thought this would be a more difficult change, but in fact it's quite simple and compatible. Just needed to add (defmodule "asdf" "modules:asdf/asdf") and now cmucl will accept both :asdf and "asdf".
Will be available in the next snapshot.
Ray