On 3/30/12 8:07 PM, Faré wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 22:21, Raymond Toy <toy.raymond(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 3/30/12 4:24 PM, Faré wrote:
>>> Same here on Linux x84. Everything works great with CMUCL 20b, but 20c
>>> fails with these low-level failures. I suspect a bug in CMUCL itself.
>> How did you run this test? I did make lisp=cmucl CMUCL=<20c> test-lisp.
>>
>> No problems with 20c or latest snapshot on OSX. (Unicode builds.)
>>
>> But I see you ran this on a linux box. I'll to check that out too....
>>
>> BTW, the gmane list for cmucl devel has been broken for quite some time.
>> It receives messages, but you can't send from there. I don't know why.
>>
> Yes, you indeed test with
> make lisp=cmucl CMUCL=$cmuclbinary test-lisp
Can't reproduce this with the 2012-03 snapshot on my Linux (openSuSE
64bit) box. Do you have any stale fasls that are getting loaded into
cmucl on startup?
>
> Using the 20c release tarball (since I fail to compile the latest from git),
I don't recall anything special being needed to compile the latest git
sources with 20c. If you can remember, please let me know.
Ray
