Re: [cmucl-imp] Re: setenv, unsetenv
16 Oct
2009
16 Oct
'09
1:32 p.m.
Madhu wrote:
My confusion appears to be because I was calling functions (via ffi) which in turn used getenv(3) to query the environment to decide on behaviour.
This, however, is enough reason to have setenv/putenv to keep *environment-list* and the C environment synchronized. If the user manipulated *environment-list* directly, the changes wouldn't be seen by ffi. This doesn't solve the issue if some function modifies the environment, though. Ray
6096
Age (days ago)
6096
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Raymond Toy