Quoting Donavon Keithley (keithley@easystreet.com):
The problem is that the 'x' argument -- which refers to the xstream for the entire document -- has no name. It's NIL. It was generated via the call chain PARSE-ROD > STRING->XSTREAM > MAKE-ROD-XSTREAM. string->xstream doesn't supply a name to make-rod-xstream.
Thank you, I have checked in a fix.
So, should it? Or should the lambda function be testing for a non-NIL name? I'm guessing the latter but I'd rather not guess.
For the purposes of the XML parser, every xstream should have a stream-name structure, I think.
d.