On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 13:10:31 -0800, Chris Dean <ctdean@sokitomi.com> wrote:

Regardless, if I make that change I still see the leak.

I have a data set I can send off-list if anyone is interested.

OK, thanks for the data. I think I've found the leak: It happened if there was a redirect and the server explicitely wanted to close the first connection, the one which sent the 302. Drakma realized that it couldn't re-use the socket stream and created a new one, but it "forgot" to close the old one. Please try the new release and see if you still have the same problems. Thanks for the bug report, Edi.