Hi Erik,
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Erik Huelsmann ehuels@gmail.com wrote:
Well, there has been some development in usocket in the direction of supporting timeouts. On platforms where timeouts are not supported, an UNSUPPORTED-FEATURE condition is signalled. If that's ignored, everything should just continue without the timeout settings.
If the above is not good enough, could you indicate what more needs to happen to make it so?
I didn't know that usocket supports timeouts now. I was assuming it didn't because the OP resubmitted an old patch.
From your description it sounds as if this should be exactly what
Drakma needs, so if someone wants to send a patch to integrate this usocket functionality (assuming this is in a released version) with Drakma, please go ahead. http://weitz.de/patches.html
Thanks, Edi.