Thank you for quick response!
I have managed to install drakma using Lispy, and then cl-selenium using asdf-install. I know about gentoo overlay, but I have decided to use asdf-install, because this way I can always have latest versions, and all packages are installed in my home directory. And I don't need to use packages.keywords and remember to setup "~amd64" keywords for every possible lisp package. Because cl+ssl is not asdf-installable, I did (asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op 'cl+ssl). I have cl+ssl-2007-07-07, but it is from tarballs not cvs. Lispy have installed drakma-0.11.3 not 0.11.5. I think asdf-install is a great advantage of lisp, very convenient, just jak CPAN for perl. All packages should be asdf-insallabe and repository must be consistent if the CL wants to be more popular. Thank you again for your kind response, and for Hunchentoot, which the more I try the more I like.
MK
Dnia 2008-04-10, czw o godzinie 21:05 +0200, Marek Kowerski pisze:
Because cl+ssl is not asdf-installable, I did (asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op 'cl+ssl).
Actually, cl+ssl is asdf-installable -- I tried it only a while ago and it does work. However, the version it installs is cl+ssl-2007-07-07, so it shouldn't make any difference as far as your setup is concerned. :)
Best regards, Daniel Janus
Dnia 11-04-2008, Pt o godzinie 08:27 +0200, Daniel Janus pisze:
Dnia 2008-04-10, czw o godzinie 21:05 +0200, Marek Kowerski pisze:
Because cl+ssl is not asdf-installable, I did (asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op 'cl+ssl).
Actually, cl+ssl is asdf-installable -- I tried it only a while ago and it does work. However, the version it installs is cl+ssl-2007-07-07, so it shouldn't make any difference as far as your setup is concerned. :)
Best regards, Daniel Janus
Right, it is. My mistake. And rather unfortunately it is 2007-07-07. I will try cvs version during the weekend.
Best regards MK
-
Daniel Janus -
Marek Kowerski