![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/c29341e85441dfee17716b528747ec12.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
22 Sep
2015
22 Sep
'15
9:29 p.m.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Daniel KochmaĆski <daniel@turtleware.eu> wrote:
I'm asking this question because we're considering making C99-supporting compiler as a dependency for ECL C backend.
This will relieve us from writing backward-compatible workarounds for the older standard and will simplify the code. That also means, that various improvements will be possible and code will be easier to maintain.
+1. This would be a welcome improvement. -- Arto Bendiken | @bendiken | http://ar.to