Re: least-positive vs least-positive-normalized

Hey,

the issue has now been fixed in the develop branch, we use the {FLT,DBL,LDBL}_TRUE_MIN constants from the C11 standard where available.

Am 06.02.19 um 06:39 schrieb Raymond Toy:

 >
 > Or maybe ecl really meant to turn on flush-to-zero so that no
 > denormals can
 > occur?
 >

ECL signals a floating-point-overflow/underflow conditions unless
disabled by an internal function si:trap-fpe.

You trap on underflow by default?  That seems unusual and kind of annoying.

No, that's not correct. By default, we only trap on overflow, division by zero and invalid operations.

Best regards, Marius Gerbershagen