Re: [erlisp-devel] openmcl patches

Eric Lavigne wrote:

If you can't find a way to improve the speed, it might be okay to submit your changes as they stand.

I've already put them in, because I don't see how his OpenMCL support is significantly more retarded then the current CMUCL or AllegroCL support. Busy waiting is a HUGE no-no. Also, the SBCL support doesn't work with SBCL 0.9.3 yet. Having this stuff in the repository at least allows people to play with it and send patches.

I will *try* to do something about these this week. I've played a bit with AllegroCL's multiprocessing, and I have SBCL 0.9.3 installed now. But time is limited, as always.

- Dirk