[erlisp-devel] Description of pushed patches.
Expanded timeout clause syntax to support time-units. Dirk Gerrits <dirk@dirkgerrits.com>**20050615235950] allegro-threads Eric Lavigne <lavigne.eric@gmail.com>**20050711110548 Modified threading procedures in compatibility.lisp to support Allegro Common Lisp. Added structure erlisp-event to emulate SBCL's wait-queue. Added low-level mutex operations (lock-mutex and unlock-mutex) to support erlisp-event.
dirk@dirkgerrits.com wrote:
Expanded timeout clause syntax to support time-units. Dirk Gerrits <dirk@dirkgerrits.com>**20050615235950]
Hmm, I'm guessing my script isn't completely fool proof. The above is an artifact caused by darcs's inventory format not really being line based. This patch has been in the repository for quite a while already. Kind regards, Dirk Gerrits
Expanded timeout clause syntax to support time-units. Dirk Gerrits <dirk@dirkgerrits.com>**20050615235950]
Hmm, I'm guessing my script isn't completely fool proof. The above is an artifact caused by darcs's inventory format not really being line based. This patch has been in the repository for quite a while already.
Kind regards,
Dirk Gerrits
I don't think that patch was part of my working copy, though. The with-timeout that I worked on used only seconds. Some manual effort is probably required to merge those two patches. Eric
Dear Dirk, I used this command to get a fresh copy of the erlisp repository, as described on the erlisp download page: darcs get http://www.dirkgerrits.com/darcs/erlisp The result looked a lot like what I downloaded a week ago - no indication of Allegro compatibility. I tried using "darcs changes" and it looks like the most recent patch was on June 15, moving the license to a different file. "darcs pull" indicated that there were no additional patches available. Am I looking at the wrong repository? Regards, Eric
Eric Lavigne wrote:
Dear Dirk,
I used this command to get a fresh copy of the erlisp repository, as described on the erlisp download page: darcs get http://www.dirkgerrits.com/darcs/erlisp
The result looked a lot like what I downloaded a week ago - no indication of Allegro compatibility. I tried using "darcs changes" and it looks like the most recent patch was on June 15, moving the license to a different file. "darcs pull" indicated that there were no additional patches available. Am I looking at the wrong repository?
Hey Eric, are you still seeing this problem? I can't seem to reproduce it on my laptop. Fresh checkouts get all my patches and your 'allegro-threads' one. I can try a friend's computer tomorrow if you're still having this problem. Kind regards, Dirk Gerrits
Dear Dirk,
I used this command to get a fresh copy of the erlisp repository, as described on the erlisp download page: darcs get http://www.dirkgerrits.com/darcs/erlisp
The result looked a lot like what I downloaded a week ago - no indication of Allegro compatibility. I tried using "darcs changes" and it looks like the most recent patch was on June 15, moving the license to a different file. "darcs pull" indicated that there were no additional patches available. Am I looking at the wrong repository?
Hey Eric,
are you still seeing this problem? I can't seem to reproduce it on my laptop. Fresh checkouts get all my patches and your 'allegro-threads' one. I can try a friend's computer tomorrow if you're still having this problem.
Kind regards,
Dirk Gerrits
Dirk, Problem solved. There seems to be a rather long delay between committing a patch and being able to download that patch. I just cut and pasted the same "darcs pull" command that I used before, in the same directory, and now it works. Eric
Eric Lavigne wrote:
There seems to be a rather long delay between committing a patch and being able to download that patch.
Well that really shouldn't be the case, but if you experience this problem again, let us know. Kind regards, Dirk Gerrits
There seems to be a rather long delay between committing a patch and being able to download that patch.
Well that really shouldn't be the case, but if you experience this problem again, let us know.
Kind regards,
Dirk Gerrits
It seems strange to me also. I will let you know if I see this again. Eric
Eric Lavigne wrote:
Expanded timeout clause syntax to support time-units. Dirk Gerrits <dirk@dirkgerrits.com>**20050615235950]
Hmm, I'm guessing my script isn't completely fool proof. The above is an artifact caused by darcs's inventory format not really being line based. This patch has been in the repository for quite a while already.
I don't think that patch was part of my working copy, though. The with-timeout that I worked on used only seconds. Some manual effort is probably required to merge those two patches.
WITH-TIMEOUT has always used milliseconds. The handling of (different) time units is all in the syntax of RECEIVE. Are you sure you didn't have that patch? Because I'm positive it has been in the dirkgerrits.com darcs repository for as long as that repository has been there... In any case, darcs on my laptop doesn't see any conflicts with your patch. Kind regards, Dirk Gerrits
On 7/12/05, Dirk Gerrits <dirk@dirkgerrits.com> wrote:
Eric Lavigne wrote:
Expanded timeout clause syntax to support time-units. Dirk Gerrits <dirk@dirkgerrits.com>**20050615235950]
Hmm, I'm guessing my script isn't completely fool proof. The above is an artifact caused by darcs's inventory format not really being line based. This patch has been in the repository for quite a while already.
I don't think that patch was part of my working copy, though. The with-timeout that I worked on used only seconds. Some manual effort is probably required to merge those two patches.
WITH-TIMEOUT has always used milliseconds. The handling of (different) time units is all in the syntax of RECEIVE.
Are you sure you didn't have that patch? Because I'm positive it has been in the dirkgerrits.com darcs repository for as long as that repository has been there... In any case, darcs on my laptop doesn't see any conflicts with your patch.
Kind regards,
Dirk Gerrits
Dirk, Yes, I have that patch. I assumed that I didn't have it because with-timeout only used milliseconds. Eric -- plaza.ufl.edu/lavigne/
participants (3)
-
Dirk Gerrits -
dirkļ¼ dirkgerrits.com
-
Eric Lavigne