- eurolisp - mailman3.common-lisp.net

[eurolisp] BetaLambda: Third Berlin LISP User Group Meeting
by Hans Hübner 26 Nov '04

26 Nov '04

Hi all, on Monday, the 29. November 2004 at 19:00 hours, the third monthly Berlin LISP User groups' meeting takes place at c-base (http://c-base.org/) Please join in to talk about LISP and associated topics. Die c-base befindet sich im Erdgeschoß des zweiten Hinterhauses in der Rungestraße 20 in Berlin Mitte. Falls die Tür im Durchgang abgeschlossen ist, muß man hinten am Ufer durch die Glastür gehen. Nicht verzagen. Greetings, Hans

1 0

[eurolisp] Next Hamburg meeting
by Edi Weitz 16 Nov '04

16 Nov '04

The next meeting of Hamburg lispers will be on November 28. Details: Sunday, 2004-11-28, 14.00 Landesjugendring Hamburg Güntherstr. 34 22087 Hamburg We will have four talks at this meeting: - Pascal Costanza AspectL <http://common-lisp.net/project/aspectl/> - Mario Mommer (incf ffi) - a framework for convenient inclusion of foreign libraries into CL - Manuel Odendahl bknr <http://bknr.net/bknr> - Lothar Hotz NetCLOS <http://lki-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/~hotz/home.html> If people are coming from outside of Hamburg and are planning to arrive earlier please let me know. We might try to arrange for a dinner on Saturday evening. The original plan was to have a "large" meeting with international participants (like Amsterdam in September) in March 2005, so this November meeting was intended to be "small" instead. From the list of speakers you'll realize that it's not "small" at all. Anyway, there will nevertheless be another meeting in March and if whether you're from Hamburg or not you're encouraged to come to both meetings, of course... :) Cheers, Edi.

2 2

[eurolisp] http://www.dirkgerrits.com/erlisp/roadmap.html
by Hoehle, Joerg-Cyril 09 Nov '04

09 Nov '04

Dirk wrote: >Is it >just because threads with shared memory and locking are the best we can >do for parallelism, and because socket and RPC libraries are totally >adequate for distributed programming? >I think the answer is no. So do I. Therefore I was disappointed by your roadmap which talks a lot about OS threads and special (thread-local) variables. Recently I came again across Lightweight Languages Workshop 2002 http://ll2.ai.mit.edu/ You'll notice that Joe Armstrong's web server starts where Apache has already broken down due to too many concurrent users. I you go with OS threads, you'll never get there. I reread part's of Graham's On Lisp yesterday. There's one section where he mentions that a completely unperformant but working thing is still valuable to start with because it allows experimentation (similar topic idea in the article about the failure of the NIL machine/project). The reason why I want to depart from OS threads is because I expect different ways of computing arise when "threads" are extremely light weight (as in Erlang or Oz, not in UNIX), like different ways of computing arose when stack space became cheap or when memory became cheap. I.e. these days, many GNU programs allocate a few MB on the stack without shame, and programs long do in memory only what once were expensive disk-bound operations. This allows different algorithms to be used to address problems. OTOH maybe one can wait until a typical Linux can fork a 300000 threads on a 256MB machine (I haven't checked how far StateThreads and the other approaches can go). That's ~1KB per thread! Cf. http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?MessagingAsAlternativeToMultiThreading Regards, Jörg Höhle. PS: I didn't see a comp.lang.lisp thread, nor a wiki/message forum on your site and I still think eurolisp is not the right forum for this.

10 19

[eurolisp] Beer, frankfurt, tomorrow?
by Luke Gorrie 05 Nov '04

05 Nov '04

Sorry if there's a more specific list for this, but I'm passing through Frankfurt ("am Main") tomorrow from around noon until around 7pm and wondered if any Lispers in the area fancied a beer or two in the afternoon? I don't have any friends there, *sniff*, and I'm making a long flight connection (09:00 Hahn -> 22:20 Main). If anyone is interested then just mail me with Cc: to lukego(a)gmail.com. Cheers, Luke

2 3

[eurolisp] Introductory text
by Pascal Costanza 04 Nov '04

04 Nov '04

Hi everybody, I have promised to write an introductory text for the eurolisp mailing list. Unfortunately, it has taken me more time to actually start to do it than I have originally planned. Fortunately, it was less work than I expected, especially because Atrhur has already provided a very good first step in a recent posting. So I have actually created a eurolisp page at http://alu.cliki.net/eurolisp and started with his text and a few minor modifications. I hope it represents the ideas of this mailing list well, including (but not limited to) the ideas of using multiple languages. If people have suggestions for improvement, I would ask them to just edit that page (that's what a wiki is there for), but make a small announcement in this mailing list as well. If someone could provide a French translation that would be great. This would allow our French fellows to directly link to that site. Cheers, Pascal -- Tyler: "How's that working out for you?" Jack: "Great." Tyler: "Keep it up, then."

2 1

[eurolisp] Regex Coach in the news ...
by rm＠fabula.de 01 Nov '04

01 Nov '04

Just came accross this blog entry: http://powerbook.blogger.de/topics/Programme/ This is good propaganda for LISP - thank's Edi! Ralf Mattes

3 4

[eurolisp] Cologne Lisp Users Meeting
by Peter Herth 29 Oct '04

29 Oct '04

The next meeting of the Cologne Lisp Users Group will be held at November the 7th, at 16.00. All Lispers or people curious to find out about Lisp and other Lispers from Cologne or any other place on this planet are welcome to join us :). Pascal Costanza will give a talk, about a minimal object system in Common Lisp and perhaps about AspectL. The meeting will take place at: Heinsberg Str. 14 Erdgeschoss Koeln tel: 0221 - 9234153 A description about how to reach this place and more information about past meetings at: http://alu.cliki.net/Cologne Peter -- Dipl.-Phys. Peter Herth pet project: http://dawn.netcologne.de homepage: http://www.peter-herth.de get Ltk here: http://www.peter-herth.de/ltk/

2 1

[eurolisp] Hi (and Koeln)
by Arthur Lemmens 24 Oct '04

24 Oct '04

Hi everybody (or is that nobody at this stage?), I'll probably come to the next Koeln meeting. Is the date of 7 November already agreed upon now? Will someone give a talk, or are we just going to chat and relax? Arthur

6 9

Re: [eurolisp] Reply-to
by Tayssir John Gabbour 19 Oct '04

19 Oct '04

Good morning, Ok, the vote's 8 to 3 in favor of reply-to -> list by default. Tech can create arbitrary divisions, when ideally it should be configurable per-person. Sorry about that, I guess that's how users feel. If your name isn't listed, I didn't count your vote, so please tell me. ((albert björn christophe dirk faré hans nick tayssir) (arthur edi lars)) So I'm making the change, since discussion appears to be done, but of course I could be acting too quickly and unilateraly. In that case just point it out. MfG, Tayssir -- Want a good video talk on the standardization of Common Lisp's OOP subsystem? http://www.archive.org/movies/details-db.php?collection=opensource_movies&c… --- Tayssir John Gabbour <tayss_temp2(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > --- Tayssir John Gabbour <tayss_temp2(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > If you feel strongly about this issue, please respond to me personally or > > go here: > > http://alu.cliki.net/Voting%20Page > > > > If you respond to me, you only need say "replies should go to the list by > > default" or "replies should go to one person by default". > > Incidentally, I won't take an action on the vote until I get the impression > people have had enough time to consense/discuss/etc. But I realize people > aren't here to discuss subtle admin issues or read about votes. ;) > > (If it turns out there are a number of such issues, we can have a separate > admin list for interested people. I think there won't be though.) > > MfG, > Tayssir

1 0

[eurolisp] Reply-to
by Dirk Gerrits 19 Oct '04

19 Oct '04

I believe the list is not automatically inserting a Reply-to: eurolisp(a)common-lisp.net into e-mail headers. Could anyone turn that on? Or if it is already on, could you explain why my posts so far haven't gotten such a Reply-to in the header? Kind regards, Dirk Gerrits

7 13