Update of /project/gsharp/cvsroot/gsharp/Doc In directory common-lisp.net:/tmp/cvs-serv21136

Modified Files: gsharp.tex Log Message: fixed minor typos in the documentation.

Date: Tue Nov 15 20:14:58 2005 Author: rstrandh

Index: gsharp/Doc/gsharp.tex diff -u gsharp/Doc/gsharp.tex:1.5 gsharp/Doc/gsharp.tex:1.6 --- gsharp/Doc/gsharp.tex:1.5 Tue Nov 1 18:56:51 2005 +++ gsharp/Doc/gsharp.tex Tue Nov 15 20:14:58 2005 @@ -702,7 +702,7 @@

There is a slight problem with \emph{head slices} and \emph{tail slices} which is why they are not implemented yet. While -conceptually these slices below to the segment of their +conceptually these slices belong to the segment of their corresponding layer, the layout algorithm must align them with the last measure of the previous segment and the first measure of the next segment. To make it impossible for those slices to stick out @@ -738,7 +738,7 @@ but that is not all there is to it. In fact, we also know that \emph{on a given line}, the smallest geographic distance possible (a global parameter of the score that determines denseness and that we -will call $w_min$) is assigned to the shortest temporal distance on +will call $w_{min}$) is assigned to the shortest temporal distance on that line, \emph{independently of the absolute value of that temporal distance}. The other geographic distances are adjusted accordingly. Thus, a measure can take up a lot more space on a line if other