n Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 3:40 AM, David Catteeuw davidcatteeuw@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Munawar,
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Munawar Cheema munawar.a.cheema@gmail.com wrote:
I installed gsll from quicklisp. I had to manually give values for the libgsl and libgslclas to get the install to work.
I've been using the patch below to fix this problem in gsll's initialisation code. I think it should use "gsl-config --libs" instead of "gsl-config --prefix" to find libgsl.
--- a/gsll-20140211-git/init/init.lisp 2014-04-28 11:48:43.000000000 +0800 +++ b/gsll-20140211-git/init/init.lisp 2014-04-28 12:15:59.000000000 +0800 <at> <at> -63,7 +63,11 <at> <at> (read-line s))) #+unix (defun gsl-config-pathname (pn)
- (merge-pathnames pn (pathname (format nil "~a/" (gsl-config
"--prefix"))))))
- (flet ((libpath ()
(let ((s (gsl-config "--libs-without-cblas")));; example output: -L/usr/local/Cellar/gsl/1.16/lib -lgsl(pathname (format nil "~a/" (subseq s 2 (- (length s)6)))))))
(merge-pathnames pn (libpath)))))(cffi:define-foreign-library libgslcblas (:darwin #+ccl #.(ccl:native-translated-namestring
If I remember correctly, this was once posted on this mailing list.
Just to be sure it was installed correctly I ran the following:
CL-USER> (in-package :gsl) #<Package "GSLL"> GSL> (lisp-unit:run-tests) Unit Test Summary | 3983 assertions total | 3964 passed | 19 failed | 6 execution errors | 0 missing tests
#<TEST-RESULTS-DB Total(3983) Passed(3964) Failed(19) Errors(6)>
GSL>
Are these results consistent with expectations or should I be getting no failures or execution errors?
I think this is expected, but you should probably check each failure/error and decide for yourself whether or not it has an impact on what you want do. For example, they may be small numeric inconsistencies that some people care and others do not care about.
Regards, david.
I have pushed what I hope is a solution to the antik-multiple-systems branch, as ad5409ec81. Mac users please check. You will need to pull from the git repo; the quicklisp version is a different branch.
Thanks, Liam