Thanks for the feedback.  I tried to factor the emails out in a way that tried to balance
the number of submissions and ease of either merging or just handcoding the
changes.  I will dig a bit more into the basis-spline.

In the future I will focus patches on one issue at a time.

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Liam Healy <lhealy@common-lisp.net> wrote:
Thanks. I have modified and applied #1 and #2, which should make it
into the next QL release. #3 will have to wait; GSLL is behind even
later versions of GSL 1.x.

For patch #2, I have added the use of trivial-features to standardize
the different platforms, so I use only #+windows now for any
windows-based platform.

In the future, it would be helpful if you could not mix together
unrelated changes into a single patch, and defer sending patches until
you have figured out exactly where the problem is and how to fix it.
For example, I did not apply the removal of basis-spline, because that
works on other platforms, so this patch would gratuitously remove
capability that functions for many people.

Thanks again,
Liam

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Mirko Vukovic <mirko.vukovic@gmail.com> wrote:
> For GSLL I am attaching two git patches that accomplish several things:
> - Loading of GSL that is part of MSYS2 on Windows
> - Removed dependency on Osicat library
> - Enable loading of GSL 2.0 by fixing a bit of code in nonlinear least
> squares fitter.
> - Disabled loading of basis-spline.lisp
> - Cosmetic fixes.
>
> I could not figure out the problem with basis-spline.  I thus removed it.
> There may be a much better solution than that.
>
> I checked the above on latest CCL and SBCL on Windows 7.
>
> Warning: the two commits required some git surgery (splitting a commit into
> two).  I hope that I did not introduce additional problems with the splits.
>
> For Antik I am attaching one patch that fixes the readtable problem on CCL:
> (named-readtables:defreadtable :antik
>   (:merge :standard)
>   #-ccl(:macro-char #\# :dispatch))
>
> Without the patch all #... reader macros (CL and Antik) were deleted.  With
> this patch both CL and Antik's reader macros work in CCL.  I also tried the
> patch with SBCL, and I don't see a need for it.  But since the macro-char
> redefinition did not hurt in SBCL, I left it in.
>
>
> Mirko