18 months after 0.5.4, I've released 0.6.0: a tarball and its GPG signature are available from http://common-lisp.net/project/iolib/download.shtml .
Preliminary documentation can be found here: http://common-lisp.net/project/iolib/manual , but only for the socket library.
My next goals are to finish the new stream library(Zeta-streams) and the pathname library.
Stelian Ionescu stelian.ionescu-zeus@poste.it writes:
18 months after 0.5.4, I've released 0.6.0: a tarball and its GPG signature are available from
Cool. :-)
My next goals are to finish the new stream library(Zeta-streams) and the pathname library.
Any chance we could share pathname goodness with osicat? :-)
Oh, by the way, any news on restoring windows support?
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 01:20 +0000, Luis Oliveira wrote:
Stelian Ionescu stelian.ionescu-zeus@poste.it writes:
My next goals are to finish the new stream library(Zeta-streams) and the pathname library.
Any chance we could share pathname goodness with osicat? :-)
No. A circular dep osicat->iolib->osicat can be resolved in only two ways: splitting iolib or merging osicat into iolib, which is what I've done.
Oh, by the way, any news on restoring windows support?
After this rewrite is done, adding windows support (back) will be very easy. I might even do it myself.
Stelian Ionescu stelian.ionescu-zeus@poste.it writes:
Any chance we could share pathname goodness with osicat? :-)
No. A circular dep osicat->iolib->osicat can be resolved in only two ways: splitting iolib or merging osicat into iolib, which is what I've done.
Hmm, in what way does osicat depend on iolib?
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 21:18 +0000, Luis Oliveira wrote:
Stelian Ionescu stelian.ionescu-zeus@poste.it writes:
Any chance we could share pathname goodness with osicat? :-)
No. A circular dep osicat->iolib->osicat can be resolved in only two ways: splitting iolib or merging osicat into iolib, which is what I've done.
Hmm, in what way does osicat depend on iolib?
the pathname goodness would be a dep on iolib
-
Luis Oliveira -
Stelian Ionescu