- iterate-devel - mailman3.common-lisp.net

[iterate-devel] Your message to closer-devel awaits moderator approval
by closer-devel-bounces＠common-lisp.net 25 Apr '07

25 Apr '07

Your mail to 'closer-devel' with the subject [SPAM] a viso tribunal superior eletoral, T S E. Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. We're sorry, due to the volume of spam we receive most mailinglists require you to subscribe before posting. You may cancel this post (at the URL below) or waiting for the moderator to approve it. Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience. The reason it is being held: Message has implicit destination Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the moderator's decision. If you would like to cancel this posting, please visit the following URL: http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/confirm/closer-devel/8e2ceab6ce85901…

1 0

[iterate-devel] Your message to cffi-devel awaits moderator approval
by cffi-devel-bounces＠common-lisp.net 25 Apr '07

25 Apr '07

Your mail to 'cffi-devel' with the subject [SPAM] a viso tribunal superior eletoral, T S E. Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. We're sorry, due to the volume of spam we receive most mailinglists require you to subscribe before posting. You may cancel this post (at the URL below) or waiting for the moderator to approve it. Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience. The reason it is being held: Message has implicit destination Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the moderator's decision. If you would like to cancel this posting, please visit the following URL: http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/confirm/cffi-devel/18c8e269ee874c466…

1 0

[iterate-devel] [SPAM] a viso tribunal superior eletoral, T S E.
by iterate-devel 24 Apr '07

24 Apr '07

Spam detection software, running on the system "clnet", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Brasília Brasília, 24 de Abril de 2005 Informamos que seu titulo eleitoral teve um Cancelamento provisório. O motivo do cancelamento foi uma irregularidade em seu Cadastro de Pessoa Física (CPF) a qual motivou o cancelamento do mesmo, e também de seu título eleitoral. [...] Content analysis details: (7.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.2 INVALID_DATE Invalid Date: header (not RFC 2822) 1.7 MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID Message-Id for external message added locally 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.2 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 2.1 FRONTPAGE RAW: Frontpage used to create the message 0.3 MIME_BASE64_TEXT RAW: Message text disguised using base64 encoding 0.6 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only 0.0 MIME_BOUND_NEXTPART Spam tool pattern in MIME boundary 3.9 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook 0.9 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.

1 0

[iterate-devel] [SPAM] a viso tribunal superior eletoral, T S E.
by iterate-devel 24 Apr '07

24 Apr '07

Spam detection software, running on the system "clnet", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Brasília Brasília, 24 de Abril de 2005 Informamos que seu titulo eleitoral teve um Cancelamento provisório. O motivo do cancelamento foi uma irregularidade em seu Cadastro de Pessoa Física (CPF) a qual motivou o cancelamento do mesmo, e também de seu título eleitoral. [...] Content analysis details: (8.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.2 INVALID_DATE Invalid Date: header (not RFC 2822) 1.7 MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID Message-Id for external message added locally 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 0.2 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts 2.1 FRONTPAGE RAW: Frontpage used to create the message 0.3 MIME_BASE64_TEXT RAW: Message text disguised using base64 encoding 0.6 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only 0.0 MIME_BOUND_NEXTPART Spam tool pattern in MIME boundary 3.9 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook -0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.

1 0

Re: [iterate-devel] Texinfo version of The Iterate Manual
by Hoehle, Joerg-Cyril 10 Apr '07

10 Apr '07

Luís Oliveira wrote: >I have converted The Iterate Manual to Texinfo format. It has the >http://common-lisp.net/~loliveira/tmp/iterate-manual/ >http://common-lisp.net/~loliveira/patches/texinfo-manual.patch Thank you for your effort. Please keep it online longer as I've currently zero time to look at it and decide whether to switch. Regards, Jörg Höhle.

3 2

AW: [iterate-devel] *list-end-test*
by Hoehle, Joerg-Cyril 05 Apr '07

05 Apr '07

Hi, >Actually, there could be somewhat distinct votes >1. Eliminate or not >2. FOR IN dotted list: error out (like LOOP) or not >(compatible, someone's code may depend on this) -- apparently, >that's the issue where opinions diverge. Thinking a little bit more about the issue, here's yet another proposal: - keep the *list-end-test* variable with FOR IN only - ATOM = compatible - ENDP = raise error, like LOOP - default value is matter of debate - unconditionaly use ATOM with FOR ON, so that (iter (for x on '(1 2 . 3))) works (simultaneously compatible and like LOOP) "compatible" means with itself, i.e. the last 15 years of Iterate. Regards, Jörg Höhle.

1 0

Re: [iterate-devel] bug and fix, multiple nil tags in tagbody
by Hoehle, Joerg-Cyril 04 Apr '07

04 Apr '07

Hi, I wrote last December: >I've written a patch to fix the other issue that I mentioned: >>2. The code walker for TAGBODY is incorrect. >But I've not yet added testcases and released my patch. It's so long, so appended is the patch to please record I've still not yet added testcases :-( Regards, Jörg Höhle

1 0

[iterate-devel] *list-end-test*
by Attila Lendvai 04 Apr '07

04 Apr '07

dear list, does anyone have any objections against pushing this: Set *list-end-test* to 'endp instead of 'atom, so (iter (for foo :in something-non-list)) fails instead of silently exists it bit me several times and long ago i've changed it to 'endp on my local copy. it did not cause me any headaches with any projects i use, but i may be missing some use-cases. if nobody speaks up for long enough, i'll push it eventually. -- - attila "- The truth is that I've been too considerate, and so became unintentionally cruel... - I understand. - No, you don't understand! We don't speak the same language!" (Ingmar Bergman - Smultronstället)

3 2

[iterate-devel] new test case
by Kilian Sprotte 03 Apr '07

03 Apr '07

Hi, I propose a new test case, which unfortunately fails right now... (deftest values.previous (equal (iter (repeat 3) (for (values a b) = (floor 5 2)) (for p-a previous a) (for p-b previous b) (collect (list a b p-a p-b))) '((2 1 nil nil) (2 1 2 1) (2 1 2 1))) T) Just wanted to let you know that I was stumbling over this as a user - I probably could not fix it myself.... Cheers, Kilian

2 1

[iterate-devel] Note: iterate-devel allows posting by subscribers only
by Andreas Fuchs 17 Mar '07

17 Mar '07

Hi all, due to the volume of spam sent to this list (which generated annoying moderator nag mails almost every day), I've set the posting policy of this list to allow subscribers only (and those non-subscribers who were approved before) to post. Hope that's OK for everyone. Cheers, -- Andreas Fuchs, (http://|im:asf@|mailto:asf@)boinkor.net, antifuchs

1 0