Thanks! Sorry about the confusion. Somehow I messed up my interaction with darcs. I have caught up now. Best, r On 4/20/17 Apr 20 -8:26 PM, Attila Lendvai wrote:
thanks for the patch Robert!
i'm afraid you didn't have the latest version when you made your changes.
I'm afraid darcs is one revision control system too many for my poor brain (any chance of changing the iterate repo to git?), so I am attaching a patch file that can be applied to iterate.asd.
it's as simple as:
darcs get http://common-lisp.net/project/iterate/darcs/iterate
or just a darcs pull if you already have it. i'm not planning to invest time into migrating the repo, but then i'm just one of the guys with the commit bit.
the format of your patch looks rather strange. what did you use to produce it? the patch exe on my linux didn't understand it.
could you please take a look at the latest iterate.asd and see if anything needs to be done to it?
i'll include it here for your convenience:
;;; -*- lisp -*- system definition
(defsystem :iterate :description "Jonathan Amsterdam's iterator/gatherer/accumulator facility" :licence "MIT" :in-order-to ((test-op (test-op :iterate/tests))) :components ((:file "package") (:file "iterate" :depends-on ("package"))))
(defsystem :iterate/tests :depends-on (:iterate #+sbcl :sb-rt #-sbcl :rt) :components ((:file "iterate-test")))
(defmethod perform ((operation test-op) (component (eql (find-system :iterate/tests)))) (funcall (intern "DO-TESTS" (find-package #+sbcl "SB-RT" #-sbcl "REGRESSION-TEST"))))