[iterate-devel] iterate tests regression on SBCL 1.0.54 (quicklisp 2012-04-07 vs 2012-03-07): handler-bind.1
Iterate test suite shows regression between quicklisp 2012-03-07 and quicklisp 2012-04-07. sbcl-1.0.54.84.mswinmt.1137-215bdc8-win-x64. Test logs: quicklisp 2012-03-07: http://cl-test-grid.appspot.com/blob?key=AMIfv94-RAJv0FSm0WjXUTgYha9U7tUSAzw... failed tests: NONE quicklisp 2012-04-07: http://cl-test-grid.appspot.com/blob?key=53022 failed tests: bug/walk.2 As you see, new failure is bug/walk.2.
Is this mailing list (and the iterate library) still active? I made some patches to iterate to address issues on ACL, but I don't believe that they are moving forward to incorporation in the library. The last email on this list that seems to show anything like forward motion (and that's debatable), seems to be from 2010. There is a patch from 7 months ago from attila, though. Cheers, r
I think the problem is that Attila does not read iterate-devel. There are quite a lot of patches and bug reports submitted here in the past 2 years that haven't made it into the code. I've CC'ed Attila. I guess another question would be is there anyone else with access to the Iterate repository right now? Vladimir On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Robert Goldman <rpgoldman@sift.info> wrote:
Is this mailing list (and the iterate library) still active?
I made some patches to iterate to address issues on ACL, but I don't believe that they are moving forward to incorporation in the library.
The last email on this list that seems to show anything like forward motion (and that's debatable), seems to be from 2010.
There is a patch from 7 months ago from attila, though.
Cheers, r
_______________________________________________ iterate-devel site list iterate-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/iterate-devel
On 5/7/12 May 7 -10:09 AM, Vladimir Sedach wrote:
I think the problem is that Attila does not read iterate-devel. There are quite a lot of patches and bug reports submitted here in the past 2 years that haven't made it into the code.
I've CC'ed Attila. I guess another question would be is there anyone else with access to the Iterate repository right now?
This is what I see at common-lisp.net: iterate:x:1506:afuchs,mbaringer,alendvai,jhoehle Perhaps it would be a good thing to give some additional people the commit bit; I am not sure if anyone other than Attila is currently active (apologies if I am wrong about that). Cheers, r
Perhaps it would be a good thing to give some additional people the commit bit; I am not sure if anyone other than Attila is currently active (apologies if I am wrong about that).
i'm "active", and reading the list every once in a while, and i even have all pending issues starred, but i don't have ACL. and also, many of the iterate bugs are due to its walker implementation, and when i darcs initialized the hu.dwim.reiterate repo, i kinda gave up on fixing iterate itself. (i haven't switched to reiterate myself in my projects yet, and i'm not planning to make it 100.00% compatible drop-in replacement, although providing a separate package with a few clause expanders should be simple) -- attila Notice the erosion of your (digital) freedom, and do something about it! PGP: 2FA1 A9DC 9C1E BA25 A59C 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39 OTR XMPP: 8647EEAC EA30FEEF E1B55146 573E52EE 21B1FF06
On 5/9/12 May 9 -5:50 PM, Attila Lendvai wrote:
Perhaps it would be a good thing to give some additional people the commit bit; I am not sure if anyone other than Attila is currently active (apologies if I am wrong about that).
i'm "active", and reading the list every once in a while, and i even have all pending issues starred, but i don't have ACL.
Would you consider getting someone else into the group, then? I am not really in a position to volunteer for much upkeep right now, but perhaps could help scrounge someone up. Iterate has moved in to be one of the libraries that's used in pretty much all of our projects, so I'm motivated to help keep it shiny. Cheers, r
Would you consider getting someone else into the group, then? I am not really in a position to volunteer for much upkeep right now, but perhaps could help scrounge someone up.
well, this decision is in no way my responsibility, or is iterate "my" project in any sense. it was just dormant when i had several patches, so i asked for the commit bit. but with that in mind i support that more people get commit bits, and especially so when it comes to you Robert. -- attila Notice the erosion of your (digital) freedom, and do something about it! PGP: 2FA1 A9DC 9C1E BA25 A59C 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39 OTR XMPP: 8647EEAC EA30FEEF E1B55146 573E52EE 21B1FF06
On 5/11/12 May 11 -12:58 PM, Attila Lendvai wrote:
Would you consider getting someone else into the group, then? I am not really in a position to volunteer for much upkeep right now, but perhaps could help scrounge someone up.
well, this decision is in no way my responsibility, or is iterate "my" project in any sense. it was just dormant when i had several patches, so i asked for the commit bit.
but with that in mind i support that more people get commit bits, and especially so when it comes to you Robert.
I certainly don't mean to criticize what you are doing: I am grateful for it. I just think it would be nice to get some more people with the commit bit. I'm probably not the ideal person myself, but perhaps we can get a volunteer or two. I imagine as the most active person on the project now, it would probably be up to you to authorize such a person, so that the cl.net admins will convey the sacred privilege. Cheers, r
I certainly don't mean to criticize what you are doing: I am grateful for it. I just think it would be nice to get some more people with the
no worries, i didn't read it that way, and sorry if i sounded like suggesting that. re commit bits, i guess for handing some out first we need people to step up and volunteer... ;) i support anyone who deals with the codebase responsively (doesn't experiment with revolutionary refactorings in the official repo). -- attila Notice the erosion of your (digital) freedom, and do something about it! PGP: 2FA1 A9DC 9C1E BA25 A59C 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39 OTR XMPP: 8647EEAC EA30FEEF E1B55146 573E52EE 21B1FF06
participants (4)
-
Anton Vodonosov -
Attila Lendvai -
Robert Goldman -
Vladimir Sedach