Daniel Hasumi-Dickison wrote:
I just found that iterate (v 1.2-ansi) makes the symbol count a synonym for counting. Since count is a Common Lisp function, it shouldn't be overloaded.
Sure. Where did you get v1.2? 1.4 is current, and for sure is free of such a collision. There are many other improvements. Be sure to upgrade.
Regards, Jorg Hohle.
Sure. Where did you get v1.2? 1.4 is current, and for sure is free of such a collision. There are many other improvements. Be sure to upgrade.
life would be easier if there was an up-to-date project page and an easy to access source repository. since then i've got an account on common-lisp.netand a project (cl-graphviz), and it was very easy and painless (thanks to *Erik Enge*).
i would be happy to help updating the project page at common-lisp.net and creating a darcs repository (which is IMHO far more user friendly then arch). we could of course keep the old arch repo for historical reasons. Joerg, if you don't have an account i can help getting one (sending you a template mail based on what i've sent, links to descriprions on how to generate a gpg key if you don't have any, etc) and if you agree i can ask for write rights for the project on c-l.net.
also looking at http://common-lisp.net/project/iterate/ there's a comment "I'm looking forward to hearing from you!" but i can't find who is saying this... is that you Joerg? :)
just my 0.02,
- attila
(alias 101 on irc &no 'its not lisp code :)
Today, Attila Lendvai attila.lendvai@gmail.com wrote:
life would be easier if there was an up-to-date project page and an easy to access source repository. since then i've got an account on common-lisp.net and a project (cl-graphviz), and it was very easy and painless (thanks to Erik Enge).
Agreed. Since I rather quietly removed my maintainer's hat, the page has bit-rotted a bit. I'd be glad to suggest you and Joerg as members of the iterate project group to the cl.net admins.
i would be happy to help updating the project page at common-lisp.net and creating a darcs repository (which is IMHO far more user friendly then arch). we could of course keep the old arch repo for historical reasons. Joerg, if you don't have an account i can help getting one (sending you a template mail based on what i've sent, links to descriprions on how to generate a gpg key if you don't have any, etc) and if you agree i can ask for write rights for the project on c-l.net.
Great plan. I'll send the write rights proposal myself.
also looking at http://common-lisp.net/project/iterate/ there's a comment "I'm looking forward to hearing from you!" but i can't find who is saying this... is that you Joerg? :)
That would be me, from when the page (and iterate itself) was hosted on boinkor.net. So, as soon as you have write privs to iterate, you can do what you want with the page. (-:
just my 0.02,
- attila
Cheers,
Today, Andreas Fuchs asf@boinkor.net wrote:
Agreed. Since I rather quietly removed my maintainer's hat, the page has bit-rotted a bit. I'd be glad to suggest you and Joerg as members of the iterate project group to the cl.net admins.
And it is done. Attila, you now have write permissions. When Joerg requests a cl.net account, I'll get him added, too.
Have fun,
And it is done. Attila, you now have write permissions. When Joerg requests a cl.net account, I'll get him added, too.
thanks!
now all i need is the latest sources, or a pointer to them (there may have been some changes since the 1.4.2 release). Joerg, could you please help in this? once i have the latest sources (doc sources, too) i'll create the darcs repo and update the page to reflect it.
other then this i'm not planning to commit stuff to the sources in the future without prior discussion. (but even then darcs makes out-of-order rollback trivial :)
- attila
(alias 101 on irc &no 'its not lisp code :)
-
Andreas Fuchs -
Attila Lendvai -
Hoehle, Joerg-Cyril