I was thinking we could tag the current master as 1.6.0 and call it a release. I hate to leave people -- especially people who get their copy of iterate from quicklisp -- stuck using a version of iterate that has known bugs for which a fix has been committed.
I would bump the current version number to 1.6.0 to indicate that there are new features but that we are backward-compatible.
Note that we now warn on the use of `count`, but I would argue that emitting a warning isn't a true backwards incompatibility, and the new state of `iterate` doesn't seem to warrant calling it 2.0
Thoughts? Anyone even read this mailing list?
On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 at 01:04, Robert Goldman rpgoldman@sift.info wrote:
I was thinking we could tag the current master as 1.6.0 and call it a release. I hate to leave people -- especially people who get their copy of iterate from quicklisp -- stuck using a version of iterate that has known bugs for which a fix has been committed.
I would bump the current version number to 1.6.0 to indicate that there are new features but that we are backward-compatible.
Note that we now warn on the use of count, but I would argue that emitting a warning isn't a true backwards incompatibility, and the new state of iterate doesn't seem to warrant calling it 2.0
Thoughts? Anyone even read this mailing list?
Yes! Releasing 1.6.0 sounds good!
Cheers, Luís
--
Luís Oliveira http://kerno.org/~luis/
Sounds a great idea to me.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 8:04 PM Robert Goldman rpgoldman@sift.info wrote:
I was thinking we could tag the current master as 1.6.0 and call it a release. I hate to leave people -- especially people who get their copy of iterate from quicklisp -- stuck using a version of iterate that has known bugs for which a fix has been committed.
I would bump the current version number to 1.6.0 to indicate that there are new features but that we are backward-compatible.
Note that we now warn on the use of count, but I would argue that emitting a warning isn't a true backwards incompatibility, and the new state of iterate doesn't seem to warrant calling it 2.0
Thoughts? Anyone even read this mailing list?
-
Don Morrison -
Luís Oliveira -
Robert Goldman