2 Feb
2006
2 Feb
'06
4:36 p.m.
On 2/2/06, Kenny Tilton ktilton@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Is there some reason the error stream from Tk is not being used? In Celtic I bound that to a second global and read that (with read-line, not read since the error output is not Lisp friendly) before trying to read the regular stream.
As it is read-data just flails away at error text until it hits something that upsets the reader, such as a comma.
Well, there is no deep reason - besides I do not know offhand how the support for a seperate error stream across all the lisps Ltk runs on is. For sure, it probably would remove some of the weird errors of Ltk when Tk sends something unreadable...
Peter