Hi all,
short story:
I wonder if anyone is using McCLIM on CLX with the :unicode feature.
Please test with:
(cl:member :unicode cl:*features*)
and report non-NIL results to this list. Thank you!
long story:
while trying to refactor the CLX backend's medium implementation, I
found a lot of #+unicode statements in Backends/CLX/medium.lisp. From
the comments, it looks like they shouldn't even be there:
; Yes, the following is a nasty hack.
; It's just a proof of concept, I'll try not to commit it :]
; If it does get committed, it shouldn't affect anyone much...
These definitions don't *seem* to me like they are used by anyone, so
I'd like to nuke them in favour of definitions that have a chance of
working with mcclim-freetype's idea of text-style properties without
requiring an ugly hack (like the method redefinitions that
mcclim-freetype currently employs).
So, again, please test if you're using McCLIM with the feature
:unicode.
Run (cl:member :unicode cl:*features*)
and report non-NIL results to this list. I may be breaking your McCLIM
soon, and we don't want that to happen without a good reason (-:
Thanks,
--
Andreas Fuchs, <asf(a)boinkor.net>, asf(a)jabber.at, antifuchs