28 Jun
2005
28 Jun
'05
12:37 p.m.
Robert Strandh strandh@labri.fr writes:
Duncan Rose writes:
[...]
Do we need to take the vendor CLIMs into account at all?
I seriously doubt it. As far as the vendors are concerned, CLIM is dead.
What about users of commercial CLIM implementations? On the other hand, if those users are sufficiently interested in CLIM, they should probably put some pressure on their vendors.
Robert, Duncan (and others): are you suggesting that McCLIM should become a new CLIM standard[*]?
Paolo
[*] For appropriate--and sufficiently fuzzy--values of "standard".
--
Lisp Propulsion Laboratory log - http://www.paoloamoroso.it/log