29 Jan
2008
29 Jan
'08
9:49 p.m.
"Andy Hefner" <ahefner@gmail.com> writes:
Incidentally, I still don't grok the added value of the mcclim-images wrapper (other than as a single interface for loading multiple file types) versus having the load functions return CLIM designs correctly. Further, the interface is broken. I favor the nuclear option.
I have come to favor the proposed bitmap extension in CLIM 2.0, which seems to be actually implemented in CLIM 2.2. I would support an obliteration of MCCLIM-IMAGES and an implementation of the bitmap-pattern protocol, but not one without the other. -- \ Troels /\ Henriksen