Re: [mcclim-devel] incremental redisplay and with-first-quadrant-coordinates

Duncan Rose writes:

It also sounds like it's already written and just needs rolling into the McCLIM code base proper?

Not MY code at least. I was very unhappy with the result. Both with respect to rendering quality and to performance.

I agree that this is poorly worded. Whether a note as to how it's implemented in McCLIM, or a whole respecification of the functionality is needed is not so clear to me. Perhaps there's no difference (specification sounds so much more formal (and final) than 'implementation note').

I don't mind calling it implementation note, but in a document to be used by someone using CLIM for application programming, it should have the correct wording.