4 Jul
2008
4 Jul
'08
6:15 p.m.
Clinton Ebadi clinton@unknownlamer.org writes:
My big question now is: is it ok if the gadget based accepting-values is not user extensible?
Fine by me. My previous statements were based on the fallacious assumption that the spec already specified most of what was needed, and if that is not the case a non-extensible implementation is better than none at all.
--
\ Troels
/\ Henriksen